We Are Our Mother of Perpetual Help Parish

Feast date: Jun 18

St. Osanna was a Dominican tertiary, who spent her adult life serving the poor and the sick and offering spiritual direction to many. However, she was also a mystic and a visionary, eventually bearing the pain and red marks of the stigmata, though not the bleeding.

She was born in 1449 to a noble Italian family. Her visions, first of angels and of the Trinity, began at the young age of five. She felt a call to religious life and became a tertiary at 17, having already rejected a marriage arranged by her father.

Her visions continued into her adult life, and she often fell into ecstasies. She was also a strong critic of the lack of morality of her day. She died in 1505.

CNA Staff, Jun 17, 2025 / 18:46 pm (CNA).

British lawmakers have voted to decriminalize abortions in England and Wales in a move that pro-life advocates and medical professionals say could endanger women and unborn children. 

The House of Commons — the publicly-elected house of Parliament of the United Kingdom — approved on June 17 an amendment to change the law so that it would no longer be illegal for women to abort their unborn children for any reason, up to birth.  

Abortions in England and Wales are currently legal for up to 24 weeks of pregnancy with the approval of two doctors and in some other cases after 24 weeks. 

Labor member of Parliament (MP) Tonia Antoniazzi, who introduced the amendment, argued it was cruel to prosecute a woman for killing her unborn child and cited police investigations of more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions.

In one case Antoniazzi cited, a mother of three who was eight months pregnant killed her unborn child and was then sentenced to about two years in prison. Antoniazzi said of the current law: “This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.”

The amendment was opposed by pro-life advocates and medical professionals. In a June 17 letter, more than 1,000 medical professionals urged the members of Parliament to oppose the abortion amendment.

In the letter, the medical professionals noted that the amendment would make abortions “possible up to birth for any reason including abortions for sex-selective purposes.” 

Antoniazzi’s amendment would, they said, “remove any legal deterrent against women administering their own abortions late in pregnancy.” 

The letter also encouraged the MPs to reinstate in-person check-ins for chemical abortions — a measure that was defeated on Tuesday.

Right to Life United Kingdom expressed concern that Antoniazzi’s amendment could endanger women “because of the risks involved with self-administered late-term abortions.”

In the June 17 press release, the pro-life group noted the high risk of late-term abortions and abortion pills, maintaining that the amendment “would enable abortion providers to cover up the disastrous consequences of the pills by post scheme.” 

The group also noted the high cost of lives lost related to the prospective abortion of viable unborn children. The amendment, they said, could lead to “an increased number of viable babies’ lives being ended well beyond the 24-week abortion time limit and beyond the point at which they would be able to survive outside the womb.” 

The decriminalization amendment, which was part of a broader crime bill, passed 379-137. The House of Commons will need to pass the crime bill before it goes to the House of Lords — the second chamber of the U.K. Parliament — where it could be delayed but not blocked.

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 17, 2025 / 18:26 pm (CNA).

As the Trump administration steps up immigration enforcement actions throughout the country, U.S. bishops are raising their voices in solidarity with unauthorized immigrants who are being arrested “on the basis of immigration status alone” and sending the message that “enforcement alone” cannot be the solution to addressing the nation’s immigration challenges.

Speaking on behalf of his fellow bishops, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops president Archbishop Timothy Broglio stated that “law enforcement actions aimed at preserving order and ensuring community security are necessary for the common good. However, the current efforts go well beyond those with criminal histories.”

“The mass arrest and removal of our neighbors, friends, and family members on the basis of immigration status alone, particularly in ways that are arbitrary or without due process, represent a profound social crisis before which no person of goodwill can remain silent,” Broglio said.

“On behalf of my brother bishops, I want to assure all of those affected by actions which tear at the fabric of our communities of the solidarity of your pastors,” Broglio continued. “Count on the commitment of all of us to stand with you in this challenging hour.”

At the same time, referencing protests against immigration enforcement in various cities across the country, Broglio insisted that “while protest and dissent can be a legitimate expression of democratic participation, violence is never acceptable.”

The prelate also pushed back against what he said were “unfounded accusations against Catholic service providers, who every day endeavor to provide critical support and care to the most vulnerable,” adding that such accusations “contribute to societal tensions and a growing climate of fear.”

Broglio concluded by calling for “just and humane solutions” to these immigration challenges and pledged the “cooperation and goodwill” of the nation’s bishops toward that end.

Washington D.C., Jun 17, 2025 / 17:56 pm (CNA).

During the first hearing of President Donald Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission, Bishop Robert Barron echoed Pope Benedict XVI’s warning against the “dictatorship of relativism” encroaching on American society.

Barron, bishop of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, said at the June 16 hearing that “religion is being attacked in our society” and referenced a homily given by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in April 2005, the day before he was elected pope.

“[This attack] is coming from a … philosophy that Joseph Ratzinger — Pope Benedict XVI — called the ‘dictatorship of relativism,’” Barron said. “I call it the culture of self-invention: the complete prioritization given to individual autonomy; that we decide value, that we decide meaning, that we decide purpose.”

That philosophy, according to Barron, “rightly appreciates the classical religions as the chief opponent.” He said these tensions arise from religious views that stand for objective moral values grounded on God and a stable human nature, which leads adherents of relativism to seek to push faith out of sectors of public life, such as in education and health care.

Many members of the commission and guest witnesses expressed similar concerns about the lack of faith and decline in religious liberty in the country through laws and regulations at the federal and state levels of government.

This includes rules that force religious Americans to violate their beliefs through contraception mandates for health care coverage, which the Little Sisters of the Poor defeated at the Supreme Court. Yet Catholic nuns are still fighting state-level contraception mandates in states like New York. 

Members also touched on parental rights in education, such as the ongoing Supreme Court case against Montgomery County Public Schools, where officials are denying parents the ability to opt their children out of lessons that promote transgenderism as early as preschool.

The commission includes two Catholic prelates: Barron and Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the latter of whom was absent due to transportation issues. The 14-member commission is led by Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and includes Ryan Anderson, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center; Pastor Paula White, special advisor to the White House Faith Office; psychologist and talk show host Phil McGraw; and neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, who spoke at the hearing, said the president is seeking to reverse these trends, adding that the commission’s work is “vital to addressing the emerging threats to religious liberty.” The commission will develop a report within the next year to advise Trump on how he can combat threats to religious freedom.

Bondi, who said religious liberty is “built into the foundation of our founding documents,” voiced criticism of the past administration under former President Joe Biden. She noted some recent threats to religious liberty including the prosecution of pro-life protesters, an FBI investigation into traditionalist Catholics, and the shutdown of places of worship during COVID-19.

“Every individual must be free to worship without fear, without coercion, and without government interference,” Bondi said. 

Freedom to worship or free exercise?

One theme throughout the first hearing of the commission was that the First Amendment guarantee that Congress shall make no law “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion is not limited to simply a freedom to worship God but rather extends to living out one’s faith.

Anderson, for example, argued that attacks on religious liberty are not just related to worship but rather extend to attacks on the right to “bring your religious values into the public square.”

One of the expert witnesses who addressed the commission, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty president Mark Rienzi, emphasized this point, noting that the “freedom to live out one’s faith” is essential to the First Amendment, adding that religious liberty is “the basis and bellwether for all human rights.”

Rienzi spoke about the historical efforts to defend religious liberty in the United States, noting that there were bad Supreme Court cases throughout American history, such as the Minersville School District v. Gobitis decision, which sought to force Jehovah’s Witnesses to salute the flag in schools despite their belief that it was “equivalent to worshipping a false idol.” 

This 1940 decision was quickly overturned just three years later when the court ruled in favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses in West Virginia who refused to salute the flag. Rienzi said governments often try to reject religious liberty for the case of convenience but that the court decided “some things are beyond the reach of politics and government.” 

“There are places in our lives where the government is not allowed to go,” Rienzi added.

Separation of church and state

Questions about the separation of church and state and to what degree the government can or should promote religion as a public good were also discussed at length during the commission’s hearing. 

Mark David Hall, the director of the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy at Regent University, testified that the separation of church and state is not a “bilateral barrier” but is rather meant to only restrict the state from imposing itself on the church.

Former Notre Dame law professor Gerard Bradley, who spoke as an expert witness, similarly said the American Founding Fathers did not envision a public “secularized space in which religion was banished.”

He argued that a proper promotion of the common good includes “encouragement and help and recognition of religion.” For example, he criticized lawmakers for justifying legislative prayer as just a way to solemnize the activity, arguing they should simply say “we’re praying here.”

“It’s fine if the government works with religion, even for the sake of religion,” Bradley said. 

Bradley encouraged “promoting religion for the sake of religion,” such as having prayer in public schools, but noted that the government must be careful to not be sectarian. He also said any promotion should have voluntary observance and any policy should be “considered carefully” to ensure there are no violations of people’s rights.

McGraw, commonly known as “Dr. Phil,” mildly pushed back on that position, saying: “If we’re promoting religion, that’s different than promoting choice.”

Bradley responded, arguing that just like the government “ought to promote marriage and family as good things” it should also “promote [religion] as a good thing” rather than remain neutral on the subject.

Archbishop Edward J. Weisenburger greets parishioners at Our Lady of the Lakes Parish in Waterford after Mass on Sunday, June 15, during a reception at the parish. The archbishop continues to greet parishioners around the Archdiocese of Detroit as he travels throughout southeast Michigan's communities.

ACI Prensa Staff, Jun 17, 2025 / 17:26 pm (CNA).

On the occasion of the Jubilee Year of Hope, the bishops of Cuba have published a message denouncing the terrible conditions that prevail on the island, which they said “invade the soul” of its inhabitants, causing “the horizon of hope” to blur and “sadness to take hold of the hearts of all.”

“With despair and without joy, there is no future for any people,” the bishops wrote on June 15. While emphasizing that “the risen Jesus Christ is the source and goal of true hope,” they also pointed out that “it is desirable, legitimate, and worthy of humanity that every human being be able to live and work in peace, realize their personal and family dreams, and achieve progress ever more comprehensively.”

In this regard, the Cuban Catholic Bishops’ Conference (COCC, by its Spanish acronym) recalled that when people have this opportunity, “it’s easier to motivate the pursuit and effort of the common good.” 

The bishops lamented that the country’s most vulnerable, such as "the poor, the elderly, the homeless, the hungry, those mired in addiction,” and parents overwhelmed by the uncertain future they envision for their children feel “out of hope.”

The prelates said the prevailing daily routine, which forces “the strenuous search for basic goods,” contributes to rising emigration rates, which fragments Cuban families and fosters “disillusionment and apathy” among those who remain in the country, “weighed down by the repetition of promises that never materialize.”

How to revitalize hope for Cubans?

Addressing the question of how to “revitalize the hope of so many Cubans” is a matter that the country’s bishops say “cannot be put off.” Answering that question, the bishops contend, requires “the participation and responsibility of all the sons and daughters of this land, without exclusions or preconceived or ideological answers.”

The COCC stated that this question has been the central theme of its repeated messages in recent decades, “with the sole desire to serve the common good of the homeland.” 

The conference also recognized the work of many Cubans who “with self-denial and sacrifice” fight “for a better future for the country,” expressing its gratitude to God and to these people “for the witness they offer daily.”

“All throughout the country, those attentive and respectful of the suffering of their neighbors continually hear that things aren’t right, that we can’t keep going on like this, that something must be done to save Cuba and restore hope,” the bishops wrote.

“This cry is an invitation to everyone, but fundamentally to those who hold the highest responsibilities when it comes to making decisions for the good of the nation. It’s time to create a climate, free from internal and external pressures and conditions, where the structural, social, economic, and political changes that Cuba needs can be carried out,” the bishops emphasized.

The bishops recalled that since April 2024, they have asked all Catholics to “intensify [their] prayers for Cuba, its present and its future.” Furthermore, in communion with Pope Leo XIV, they affirmed that they always choose dialogue as a mechanism to remedy the national situation, accompanied by respect for human dignity and “confidence in the enormous potential of the Cuban people.”

“With the strength of the love we profess for God and for Cuba, we wish to offer a word of encouragement: Let us not be afraid to embark on new paths!” the COCC urged.

“The risen Christ and his mother and our mother, the Most Holy Virgin of Charity of Cobre [the country’s patroness], accompanies us today and always. May they move our minds and our wills, so that, putting aside hesitation, mistrust, and fear, we may be able to open the bright and beautiful door of hope for our people,” they concluded.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 17, 2025 / 16:56 pm (CNA).

Archbishop Edward Weisenburger of Detroit has identified the non-parish churches in the archdiocese that are allowed to continue the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), following an earlier statement saying that most of the TLM celebrated in the area would come to an end. 

In April, the archdiocese announced that the TLM would no longer be celebrated at parish churches after July 1. Weisenburger said the end of the TLM was due to the Vatican’s 2023 clarification that diocesan bishops do not have the authority to allow the Masses to be held in existing parish churches.

The archdiocese reported that permissions given to parish church priests to carry out the TLM would expire and they could not be renewed, but Weisenburger said he would recognize at least four non-parish locations in the archdiocese where the TLM could still be celebrated.

On June 13, the archdiocese released a letter with an update on the Masses and a list of approved churches. 

“As there are a number of the faithful in our local Church who have found spiritual richness in this form of the Mass, I am permitting it to continue in accord with the Holy See’s parameters,” Weisenburger wrote.

“You will recall that in 2021, Pope Francis issued guidelines for the celebration of the Mass in the extraordinary form, commonly called the ‘Traditional Latin Mass.’ This is the expression of the Mass which was offered prior to Vatican II.”

The letter expressed that the Masses will be held in accordance with “the new liturgical teachings and law of the Church.”

“There are two goods which must come together as we move forward: the pastoral care of these faithful as well as fidelity to the Holy Father’s call for the ordinary form of the Mass to become the ‘unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman rite’ (Traditionis Custodes, 1),” Weisenburger said. 

“Guided by these principles, beginning July 1, 2025, the Traditional Latin Mass will be offered at St. Joseph Shrine in Detroit in the central region and three non-parish churches in each additional region of the Archdiocese of Detroit.”

The other churches include St. Irene Church in Dundee in the south region, Our Lady of Orchard Lake Chapel in Orchard Lake in the northwest region, and St. Joseph Church in Port Huron in the northeast region.

Permission for all other churches and sites that celebrate the TLM will still expire as originally planned, on June 30.

“While not every priest will retain the required permission to celebrate the Mass according to the rubrics of the 1962 missal, a number of priests will be available to serve these four regional sites,” Weisenburger explained. 

“I take seriously my charge to care for all the faithful and am confident that this new arrangement is faithful to the Church’s law while expressing my concern for your spiritual welfare.”

“I have been impressed by the rich expressions of the Catholic faith in southeast Michigan,”  Weisenburger said. “The unity of our Catholic faith need not be diminished by diversity. Likewise, fidelity to Christ is only possible if we remain faithful to the Church, under the leadership of our pope and the local bishop.”

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jun 17, 2025 / 16:26 pm (CNA).

A Georgia woman who was declared brain dead in February has given birth after four months on life support.

Adriana Smith, an Atlanta nurse, gave birth via emergency cesarean section at 29 weeks to a 1-pound, 13-ounce baby boy named Chance on Friday, June 13.

Baby Chance is currently in the NICU. Smith’s mother, April Newkirk, told 11Alive that “he’s expected to be OK,” adding: “He’s just fighting. We just want prayers for him. Just keep praying for him. He’s here now.”

According to Newkirk, doctors had been planning to deliver him at 32 weeks, but Smith had an emergency C-section Friday for unspecified reasons. 

Smith, who turned 31 on Sunday, will be taken off life support on Tuesday, June 17, her mother said. 

“I’m her mother,” Newkirk said. “I shouldn’t be burying my daughter. My daughter should be burying me.”

Smith also has a 7-year-old son. 

Background

In February, Smith visited a hospital complaining of painful headaches but was sent home with medication. The next morning, her boyfriend found her “gasping for air” and called 911. 

After a CT scan, doctors discovered multiple blood clots in her brain and eventually determined nothing could be done and declared the then-30-year-old nurse, who was nine weeks pregnant, brain dead.

Smith’s case garnered national attention in May after a local news station interviewed Newkirk, who said Emory University Hospital in Atlanta said that Smith had to remain on life support until the birth of her unborn child, citing what Newkirk said was the Georgia state abortion law. 

Newkirk said last month that not having a choice regarding her daughter’s treatment plan was difficult. She also expressed concern about raising both her grandsons and the mounting medical costs.

Georgia law prohibits abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around the sixth week of pregnancy. However, removing life support from a pregnant woman is not a direct abortion.

In response to national outcry over Smith’s case, the Georgia attorney general’s office released a statement in May clarifying that the state’s heartbeat law, which prohibits abortions after detection of a fetal heartbeat, did not require Smith be kept alive.

“There is nothing in the LIFE Act that requires medical professionals to keep a woman on life support after brain death,” said the statement, issued by Attorney General Chris Carr’s office.  

Quoting the law itself, the statement continued: “Removing life support is not an action ‘with the purpose to terminate a pregnancy.’”

A spokesperson for the Georgia House told the Washington Post in May that the LIFE Act is “completely irrelevant” regarding Smith’s situation, saying “any implication otherwise is just another gross mischaracterization of the intent of this legislation by liberal media outlets and left-wing activists.”

Although he supports the hospital’s decision to keep the unborn child alive until viability, state Sen. Ed Stetzer, the original sponsor of the LIFE Act, told CNA in May that “the removal of the life support of the mother is a separate act” from an abortion.

David Gibbs III, a lawyer at the National Center for Life and Liberty who was a lead attorney in the Terri Schiavo case, said he thinks there may be a misunderstanding about which law the hospital is invoking in Smith’s case. Georgia’s Advance Directive for Health Care Act may be the law at play here, Gibbs told CNA.

Section 31-32-9 of that law states that if a woman is pregnant and “in a terminal condition or state of permanent unconsciousness” and the unborn child is viable, certain life-sustaining procedures may not be withdrawn.

“The majority of states have advance directive laws with a pregnancy exclusion,” Gibbs explained.

A pregnancy exclusion means that if a patient is pregnant, the law prioritizes the survival of her unborn child over her stated wishes in an advance directive if there is a conflict between her wishes and the child’s well-being.

“When in doubt, the law should err on the side of life,” he said.

Vatican City, Jun 17, 2025 / 15:56 pm (CNA).

Pope Leo XIV received on June 17 at the Vatican the bishops of the Italian Bishops’ Conference (CEI, by its Italian acronym), with whom he shared four “coordinates” for being a Church that embodies the Gospel: proclamation of the Gospel, peace, human dignity, and dialogue.

At the beginning of his address, following a welcome from the president of the CEI, Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, the Holy Father thanked the Italian prelates for their prayers while recalling the bond between the Church in Italy and the Vatican, a “common and particular” relationship.

In this context, he focused on the principles of collegiality elaborated by the Second Vatican Council, urging the bishops to live that unity in their ministry and also with the successor of Peter.

Leo XIV then cited the challenges facing the Church in Italy: “secularism, a certain disaffection with the faith, and the demographic crisis.”

Reviving “the special bond between the pope and the Italian bishops,” he highlighted several “pastoral concerns” that require reflection, concrete action, and evangelical witness.

Putting Jesus Christ at the center

First, the pope emphasized the need for “renewed zeal in the proclamation and transmission of the faith.”

“In a time of great fragmentation, it is necessary to return to the foundation of our faith, to the kerygma. This is the first major commitment that motivates all the others: to bring Christ “into the veins” of humanity, renewing and sharing the apostolic mission,” he affirmed.

He therefore encouraged the bishops to discern ways to reach people “with pastoral actions capable of intercepting those who are most distant, and with tools suitable for the renewal of catechesis and the languages of proclamation.”

He specifically mentioned urban peripheries and the need to bring peace to those places, where “a Church capable of reconciliation must make herself visible,” inviting each diocese to promote pathways of education in nonviolence and for each community to become a “house of peace.“

“Peace is not a spiritual utopia: It is a humble path, made up of daily gestures that interweave patience and courage, listening and action, and which demands today, more than ever, our vigilant and generative presence,” the pope noted.

In this regard, Leo XIV cited several factors that are transforming society, such as artificial intelligence and social media. For the pontiff, in this scenario, “human dignity risks becoming diminished or forgotten, substituted by functions, automatism, simulations.”

“But the person is not a system of algorithms: He or she is a creature, relationship, mystery. Allow me, then, to express a wish: that the journey of the Churches in Italy may include, in real symbiosis with the centrality of Jesus, the anthropological vision as an essential tool of pastoral discernment,” the Holy Father said.

Faced with the danger of faith becoming “disembodied,” Pope Leo XIV recommended that bishops “cultivate a culture of dialogue” between different generations, “because only where there is listening can communion be born and only where there is communion does truth become credible.”

“The proclamation of the Gospel, peace, human dignity, dialogue: These are the coordinates through which you can be a Church that incarnates the Gospel and is a sign of the kingdom of God,” the Holy Father emphasized.

At the end of his address, the pope encouraged the prelates to maintain unity while considering the synodal journey. “Synodality becomes a mindset, in the heart, in decision-making processes and in ways of acting,” he indicated.

He also urged them to look to tomorrow with serenity, asking them not to be afraid of making courageous decisions and to “walk with the last, serving the poor.”

“No one can prevent you from proclaiming the Gospel, and it is the Gospel that we are invited to bring, because it is this that everyone, ourselves first, need in order to live well and to be happy,” he affirmed.

Pope Leo also asked the bishops to care for the lay faithful and make them “agents of evangelization” in all areas of life.

“Let us walk together, with joy in our heart and song on our lips. God is greater than our mediocrity: Let us allow ourselves to be drawn to him! Let us trust in his providence,” the Holy Father concluded.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.