We Are Our Mother of Perpetual Help Parish

The city of Baltimore. / Credit: Sean Pavone/Shutterstock

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 20, 2025 / 15:20 pm (CNA).

The Archdiocese of Baltimore has been accused of defying a Vatican order after allegedly refusing to reopen a Maryland parish despite a letter from the Holy See halting its closure. 

In the spring of 2024 Archbishop William Lori announced the “difficult” decision to merge parishes in Baltimore and surrounding suburbs as part of the archdiocesan “Seek the City to Come” initiative. Among the parishes slated for closure was St. Clare in Essex.

Several St. Clare parishioners who disagreed with the plan sought assistance from Save Rome of the West, an organization that offers consulting services “to aid in the preservation and maintenance of Catholic churches and parishes.”

Group co-founders Jason Bolte and Brody Hale helped parishioner Barbara Pivonski write and send a formal letter to the Vatican in October 2024 appealing Lori’s plan and requesting that the church reopen. 

In February they received a letter from Cardinal Lazzaro You Heung-sik, prefect of the Dicastery for the Clergy, stating that the “requested suspension” of the “extinctive merger” was “granted for the duration of the recourse.”

Bolte, Hale, and Pivonski believed the response from the Vatican approved the reopening of St. Clare while the appeal was under review, but the archdiocese disputed that interpretation. Diane Barr, a canonical consultant to the archbishop’s office, told parishioners in a letter that the suspension only meant that the church property could not be sold.

Archdiocesan spokesman Christian Kendzierski, meanwhile, told CNA that the archdiocese “is faithfully following the requirements included in the letter received from the Dicastery for Clergy.” 

The parish “remains open for baptisms, weddings, and funerals,” he said. 

“When a decree is suspended, it means that the actions which it orders, all of them, are suspended,” Hale, an attorney, told CNA. Yet “the Archdiocese of Baltimore … has refused to do that.”

Hale said if the Dicastery for the Clergy “wishe[d] to only suspend part of the decree, or some aspect of it, it would have stated as much.”

The lawyer said prior to February he had “never seen a single parish suspension issued by the Dicastery for Clergy,” and now he has witnessed more than a dozen. 

More than 12 parishes in the Diocese of Buffalo in New York similarly appealed a diocesan restructuring plan to the Vatican, asking that their churches stay open. The Vatican granted those requests and the Buffalo Diocese allowed them to remain open while the appeals were evaluated.

“It’s very unfortunate to me that the Archdiocese of Baltimore has taken this position,” Hale said, arguing that the archdiocese “deprived these good people of being able to celebrate Holy Week in their parish” and “deprived them of three months of parish life.”

Pivonski told CNA that St. Clare was “extremely active” prior to the closure. 

The parish is located in a high-poverty area, she said, and catered to the poor and homeless through frequent food donations. It was also working with pregnancy centers. 

A hearing on the matter was postponed due to Vatican departments shutting down after Pope Francis’ death. 

The case will be “presented to the Dicastery for Clergy as soon as it’s able to hear the matter,” Hale said.

Planned Parenthood gets millions of dollars in federal support each year. / Credit: Ken Wolter/Shutterstock

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 20, 2025 / 14:50 pm (CNA).

Two American Catholic bishops are hailing a Republican-led legislative effort to end certain taxpayer funds for abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood as well as an attempt to block funding for transgender drugs and surgeries for children.

Proposed budget language currently being considered in the U.S. House of Representatives would prevent Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers from receiving Medicaid reimbursements for any services. It would also end all reimbursements for transgender drugs or surgeries that doctors prescribe for children.

“Americans should not be forced to subsidize abortions and ‘gender transition’ services with their tax dollars,” Toledo, Ohio, Bishop Daniel Thomas and Bishop Robert Barron of Winona-Rochester, Minnesota, said in a joint statement on Monday from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).

Thomas is the chairman of the USCCB’s pro-life committee, while Barron chairs the Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life, and Youth.

Under current law, federal tax money cannot directly fund most abortions, but abortion clinics can still receive federal funding if the money is used in other ways. A Government Accountability Office report found that Planned Parenthood pulled in more than $1.75 billion in taxpayer funds in 2019 and 2021 from a variety of sources.

Planned Parenthood’s 2023-2024 annual report stated that the organization received nearly $800 million in taxpayer funding over a 12-month period, which accounted for almost 40% of its total revenue.

“For decades, Planned Parenthood has received government money and offered low-income women one terrible option: to end the lives of their babies,” Thomas and Barron said. 

“More recently, they have used the same taxpayer funds to expand their destructive offerings by promoting gender ideology and providing puberty blockers and hormones to minors, turning them into lifelong patients in the process.”

“Americans should not be forced to subsidize abortions and ‘gender transition’ services with their tax dollars, and we applaud measures that will finally help to defund Planned Parenthood,” they added.

“We encourage greater support for authentic, life-affirming health care providers that serve mothers and their children in need. We urge all members of Congress and the administration to work in good faith to protect vulnerable women and children from mutilating ‘gender transition’ services and the scourge of abortion.”

The proposed language is part of the so-called “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” that would set the nation’s budget and incorporate elements of President Donald Trump’s agenda. The legislation would only need a majority support in the House and the Senate.

The bill bypasses the usual 60-vote threshold needed in the Senate because certain budget bills only require a simple majority.

Although the bishops have voiced support for this part of the budget bill, they have criticized other proposed elements of the bill. Specifically, the USCCB opposes structural changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which the bishops worry could reduce access to the programs.

The proposed Medicaid reforms include work requirements for able-bodied adults under the age of 65 if they do not have young children as dependents and shifting some Medicaid costs to states if they offer benefits to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

Some of the proposed SNAP changes include shifting between 5% and 25% of the cost to states, raising the work requirement age from 54 to 64, and implementing stricter verifications to ensure money does not go to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

If the House passes its version of the bill, it will then go to the Senate, where lawmakers will likely make changes and send it back to the House. It is not yet scheduled for a vote in the House.

‘The Holy Spirit is calling us to evangelize,’ says St. Clair Shores priest who served in Peru in reaction to Pope Leo’s election

Archbishop Weisenburger pauses for a photo with Mass servers at St. Kieran Parish in Shelby Township, where the archbishop celebrated Mass and greeted parishioners Monday, May 19. The Mass is part of the archbishop's tour of welcome Masses as he gets to know the parishes, communities and people of the Archdiocese of Detroit.

Missouri State Capitol in Jefferson City Missouri. / Credit: eurobanks/Shutterstock

St. Louis, Mo., May 20, 2025 / 12:32 pm (CNA).

Republican lawmakers in Missouri approved a new referendum last week that, if passed by voters, could reinstate many of the state’s pro-life laws, largely undoing a previous statewide referendum that expanded abortion rights a few months ago. 

The ballot measure, HJR73, would ask voters if they want to allow abortion only in the case of a medical emergency, fetal abnormality, or rape or incest. It also would ban public funding for any abortions not done because of medical emergency or rape or incest. 

In addition, the referendum would allow the state General Assembly to enact laws that regulate the provision of abortions, abortion facilities, and abortion providers to ensure the health and safety of pregnant mothers.

The measure would also constitutionally ban hormones, puberty blockers, and surgeries for “gender transition” for minors. Missouri already bans those procedures for minors, but that restriction, first passed in 2023, is set to expire in August 2027.

The measure is expected to appear before voters in November 2026, or sooner if Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe, who is Catholic, calls a special election. 

Missourians had last November narrowly voted to overturn the state’s near-ban on abortion and enshrine a provision guaranteeing “reproductive freedom” in the state constitution, coming into effect Dec. 6, 2024.

Missouri law had previously extended protection to unborn babies throughout all of pregnancy with the only exception being cases of “medical emergency.”

Although the 2024 amendment language mentions that laws could be passed to restrict abortion past the point of “fetal viability,” the amendment simultaneously prohibits any interference with an abortion that a doctor determines is necessary to “protect the life or physical or mental health” of the mother.

Missouri lawmakers had in recent years passed numerous laws designed to protect patients and limit the abortion industry’s influence, including 2017 regulations requiring that abortion doctors have surgical and admitting privileges to nearby hospitals; that abortion clinics must be licensed with the state; and that clinics must meet hospital-like standards for outpatient surgery.

Soon after the 2024 amendment took effect, Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit challenging numerous pro-life protections in Missouri, including the state’s 72-hour waiting period for abortions; the state’s ban on abortions done specifically for reasons of the race, sex, or a Down syndrome diagnosis of the baby; the state’s ban on “telemedicine” abortions; and the state’s requirement that only licensed physicians may perform abortions.

The Missouri Catholic Conference (MCC), which advocates policy in the state on behalf of the state’s bishops, described the upcoming referendum as an “opportunity to add health and safety protections for mothers and their preborn children back into the state constitution.”

The MCC had previously expressed support for HJR73, urging support for “the effort to reduce abortions in the state of Missouri and to create a culture of life and compassion and limit the effects of Amendment 3.”

Missouri was one of the first states to fully ban abortion after the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022. Following the 2024 vote, Missouri and six other states expanded legal protection for abortion, while voters in Florida, Nebraska, and South Dakota voted down major pro-abortion proposals the same night.

Cardinal William Goh speaks to EWTN News Vice President Matthew Bunson in Rome on Monday, May 19, 2025. / Credit: EWTN News

Vatican City, May 20, 2025 / 11:20 am (CNA).

Singapore’s Cardinal William Goh believes Pope Leo XIV will build a greater unity within the Church, particularly for Catholic faithful often divided on matters of Church doctrine and morality.

Calling the new pontiff a “gift of God” in an interview with EWTN News Vice President Matthew Bunson, Goh said the Holy Father is the “right person” to lead the Church toward synodality and explain the balance between “orthodoxy and being progressive.”

“Being traditional is not wrong [and] going back to the orthodoxy of the Church is not wrong,” he said. “But, at the same time, we are not just asking our Church to be too legalistic about our moral doctrines in terms of practice.”

Describing the new pontiff as an active listener who is “very attentive to the concerns and sharings of the cardinals,” Goh said the Holy Father’s desire for unity is evident in both his words and actions since his May 8 election.

“I believe that, so far, based on his speeches, he is putting into practice the call to synodality,” he said. “In his meeting with the cardinals, he spoke to us in a very personal way.”

“I believe that there will be greater collaboration and greater dialogue so that we can truly bring about a greater unity in the Church,” he added.

Reflecting on issues that were “dividing the Church” during Pope Francis’ pontificate such as “ambiguity” in some teachings outlined in Amoris Laetitia and the synodal process, the Asian cardinal said he hopes Pope Leo XIV will bring clarity, and less confusion, to discussions on Catholic teaching. 

“I keep on emphasizing that we cannot talk about synodality without unity in doctrines, without unity in faith,” he told Bunson. 

“Unity that is built on superficial love can never be real unity,” he continued. “Unity must be founded on truth that is expressed in charity.”

With the continual growth of the Church in both Asia and Africa, Goh said many Catholic faithful are converts who do not want to compromise their newfound religion.    

“We are people who have strong faith in the Lord and we want to walk in the way of the Gospel,” Singapore’s first and so far only cardinal said in the interview. “In fact, we gave up the old faith in order to exchange it for the true faith.”

“We want to walk the way of the truth and follow the Gospel and what the Church taught us,” he stressed. “That is what is guiding us and our people in Asia.”

In addition to the Holy Father’s ability to be a good listener, Goh noted the pope’s ability to speak several languages has been an advantage for those wanting to discuss with him the pastoral challenges the Church faces in different parts of the world before and after the recent conclave.

“The good thing about Pope Leo is that he speaks English because very often many of the Asian cardinals don’t speak Italian so well,” he said. “So we want to communicate and to share our views with the Holy Father but it’s a bit difficult because of the language.”   

“I think once you know English, Spanish, and Italian, you can cover at least two-thirds of the globe, right?” he said.